Owner's Advisor: A personal trainer for your project.
Involving the right advisor in the pre-project process may be the difference to ensuring your project execution goes smoothly, or not. This blog is the first post in a two-part series, this post will cover what an Owner’s advisor is and what they can do to help you achieve a successful project. In the second post, we will discuss how to select the right candidate for your project. So let’s dive into the basics of an Owner’s Advisor role and their lines of services.
Defining the Role
Prior to discussing services, it is important to define what an Owner’s advisor is. An Owner’s advisor is the broadest term for a third-party specialist, but more precisely it’s a firm with an expertise in a specialized area who is employed or engaged by an Owner to assist in improving internal and external processes. They often provide services in the areas of planning, design, delivery, and/or general advising.
Owners must engage advisors with the appropriate mix of leadership, technical and facilitation skills necessary to create a successful project and outcome. Based on the advisor’s scope of services one or more of these skills may be weighted as more critical to the success of your project than others.
Before jumping into scope of services it’s important to understand the varying degrees of involvement that an Owner can choose to engage with their advisor. This involvement, when listed from least to most are commonly labeled as an Owner’s consultant, Owner’s trusted advisor, and Owner’s representative. As mentioned, this terminology can be correlated with the types of services that an Owner’s advisor would perform.
As an example, a consultant can be hired to perform a specific task or limited set of tasks - such as writing and reviewing a grant proposal. On the other hand, the Owner’s representative would be involved in many aspects of the project and likely be involved for an extended amount of time over the project’s life cycle. However, these definitions and scopes of services are not exclusive of one another. In reality, definitions and services are often dynamic and overlapping as projects evolve.
Scope of Services
The list of potential services that an advisor could offer is quite vast and is driven by the needs of the Owner. For brevity we will focus on common service an Owner’s representative would offer in regards to the construction field. However, many of these ideas can be generalized to apply to any project type. It’s important for the Owner and project team to engage in a robust conversation about what types of outside expertise are necessary for a successful project and what talent you have internally with your current staff.
Now to look at seven critical ways that an Owner’s representative could help you with your next construction project:
Assisting with the request for qualification/proposal (RFQ/RFP) process including the selection of the right design firm or contractor. Potential service consist of writing the RFQ/RFP, developing selection criteria and sitting on the selection committee.
Developing the 10% conceptual design (basis of design). This document allows all of the potential candidates to have the same starting point. Having a well-defined basis of design allows effective comparisons in competing design-build proposals.
Working as an extension of the Owner’s staff during the project life cycle. A large project may require the Owner to hire dedicated staff to help manage it. While using an Owner representative allows you to call upon additional resources as the project requires.
Performing engineering reviews at the design milestones. An extra set of eyes on the plans will help ensure that they are accurate and meet your specifications. An Owner’s representative provides the expertise to evaluate the design work of your design-build team.
Providing value engineering (VE). VE optimizes projects by bringing together a cross-disciplinary team to examine a project and suggest approaches to drive down costs without impacting quality. An Owner’s representative can assemble an independent team of experts to give the project a fresh look.
Preparing constructability reviews. Your Owner’s representative can perform a detailed review of completed plans and specifications. Deficiencies, constructability concerns, conflicts or other issues that may impact the project’s construction sequencing, coordination, safety, cost or schedule will be flagged and addressed early, saving time and money.
Delivering inspection or field services during construction. Ensuring that the quality is maintained and that the construction site runs efficiently and safely with excellent record-keeping is the Owner’s paramount concerns. An Owner’s representative can provide qualified, certified field staff to steward your project.
Where You See the Results
So what is the bottom line when it comes to Owner’s advisor? Well, there are several key benefits that an Owner can take advantage of in hiring an Owner’s advisor. The first is saving time and money, an Owner’s advisor gives an Owner the ability to quickly ramp up or down their staffing by changing the capacity without the need to hire and train staff. This means an Owner can avoid investing time and money in onboarding and training staff, which becomes costly for a one-time or large project.
A second key benefit is an Owner’s ability to tap into the technical resources of the advisor. This means access to specialized technical staff to answer Owner questions and reduce the uncertainty and risk in a project. Additionally, the advisor’s technical staff can perform specialized tasks or review project documents on an “as-needed” basis. And there are intangible benefits as well. If you identify an Owner’s advisor who is a skilled teacher and trusted advisor, you can count of their experience and expertise to help build the capacity of your internal team.
Contact Melvin Consulting to learn more about how an Owner’s advisor can benefit your project and how we are “Advancing Your Vision from Concept to Concrete”
The opinions expressed in this post are the authors own and does not reflect the view of Melvin Consulting PLLC
What is a "638" contract? A review of Public Law 93-638
What does it mean in Indian Country when we say “638 contract” or use it as a verb and say that we will “638 it,” and what does it mean for the associated tribal programs and projects?
The History of Public Law 93-638
Looking back at history, the term “638 contract” or more formally a self-determination contract are shorthand for the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) of 1975 (Public Law 93-638), which has been amended in 1988, 1994 and 2000. This law recognizes that American Indian tribes have an inherent status as sovereign nations, which is distinguished by their relationship with the federal government and this law marked a distinct change in federal policy toward Native American tribes and tribal people. This self-governance policy has been so successful that over 50% of all federal Indian programs are carried out by tribes rather than federal agencies (Strommer and Osborne, 2014).
What Does “638 it” Mean for Programs and Projects?
The signing and passage of the ISDEAA meant Congress understood the inherent right tribes possess to set their destiny through tribally run programs for health care, roads, and any other program operated by the federal government to the benefit of tribal nations. Under the ISDEAA any federal program, function, service, or activity (PFSA) must transfer their operations to tribes upon formal request for the benefit of the tribe. This mandate is legally structured in the form of a contract defined in ISDEAA or a “638 contract.” In some cases, tribes may compact a federal PFSA, which can be a more favorable method for tribes to operate programs, but this requires a more extensive formal request.
So “638-ing it” means transferring the responsibility and funds for a PFSA from the federal government to the tribe. By law the government must give the tribe the same amount of money it spent itself on the PFSA, making this is a simple dollar for dollar transfer. There’s more to it though, tribes are also able to be paid for administrative overhead costs, called contract support costs. These costs include personnel administration, training, and facility support cost, among others. In a nutshell, this overhead brings new revenue to the tribe and allows the tribe to gain experience, develop staff and build its own infrastructure instead of these overhead funds going to federal programs. It allows tribes to manage and control their own assets.
So What Is The Benefit?
There are many benefits to American Indian tribes and Native people by “going 638” and assuming the operations of a PFSA. A few of them are worth mentioning. First, it means a direct link between policy and Indian communities. For too long, programs were operated by far removed federal officials, so when a tribe or its people “638” a PFSA, such as a clinic, it is the local tribal community deciding how to deliver care to its people by operating the facility. For example, if the tribe sees a greater community need in its pharmacy program, it can act to change its pharmacy policy or hire pharmacy staff without having to ask the federal government for permission.
Second, it helps with economic development and the bottom line. Tribes that “638” federal PFSA’s build capacity in their local community through hiring local talent and keeping dollars re-circulating in Native communities many times over and by giving members of the tribe opportunities to work within their communities as professionals or business entrepreneurs. Tribal Nations see increasing success as they operate PFSA’s and share their stories of the benefits their community receive from “going 638.”
Lastly, you don’ have to go it alone. Please review our blog post on selecting an Owner’s Advisor then contact Melvin Consulting by clicking the learn more button below to see how 638 contracting can benefit your community and how we are “Advancing Your Vision from Concept to Concrete”.
The opinions expressed in this post are the authors own and does not reflect the view of Melvin Consulting PLLC
Geoffrey D. Strommer & Stephen D. Osborne, The History, Status, and Future of Tribal Self-Governance Under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 39 Am. Indian L. Rev. 1 (2014),
https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol39/iss1/1